GeForce 210 vs GeForce 6600 GT
GeForce 210
Popular choices:
GeForce 6600 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 210 is positioned at rank 599 and the GeForce 6600 GT is on rank 340, so the GeForce 6600 GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 210
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6600 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 210 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce 210 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6600 GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6600 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 210 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 210 | GeForce 6600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 210 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $50 for the GeForce 6600 GT, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 865% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 210 | GeForce 6600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+865%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 210 and GeForce 6600 GT
GeForce 210
The GeForce 210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 138 points.
GeForce 6600 GT
The GeForce 6600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 210 scores 138 and the GeForce 6600 GT reaches 143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 210 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 6600 GT uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 210) vs 1,344 (GeForce 6600 GT). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 210) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600 GT). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 6600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 138 | 143+4% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1344+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 2.634 TFLOPS+230% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz+6% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 24 | 112+367% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+29% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 6600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 210 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6600 GT has 256 MB. The GeForce 210 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 210) vs 384 KB (GeForce 6600 GT) — the GeForce 210 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 6600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 210) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6600 GT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 6600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 210) vs No (GeForce 6600 GT). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 210) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6600 GT).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 6600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 210 draws 10W versus the GeForce 6600 GT's 150W — a 175% difference. The GeForce 210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 210) vs 350W (GeForce 6600 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 183mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 6600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-93% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 183mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.8+1280% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 210 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the GeForce 6600 GT launched at $199 and now averages $50. The GeForce 210 costs 90% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.6 (GeForce 210) vs 2.9 (GeForce 6600 GT) — the GeForce 210 offers 851.7% better value. The GeForce 210 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 6600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-75% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-90% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6+852% | 2.9 |
| Codename | GP108B | GK104 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | August 16 2012 |
| Ranking | #643 | #472 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 210 and GeForce 6600 GT
