GeForce 210 vs GeForce G200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 210 vs GeForce G200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 210 vs GeForce G200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 210

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 506.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅GeForce G200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 210 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 30W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce G200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce G200

2017

Why buy it

✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
498% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 30W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce G200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 210 instead at 138 vs 136, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 210 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 210 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $249 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 506.8% (2.8 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce G200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 210 vs GeForce G200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 210

The GeForce 210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 138 points.

GeForce G200

The GeForce G200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 136 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 210 scores 138 and the GeForce G200 reaches 136 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 210 is built on Pascal while the GeForce G200 uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 210) vs 384 (GeForce G200). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 210) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G200). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce G200
G3D Mark Score	138+1%	136
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	1.127 TFLOPS+41%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1468 MHz+41%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	144 KB	144 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce G200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 210 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce G200 carries 512 MB. GeForce 210 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 210 and 128-bit on the GeForce G200.

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce G200
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 210) vs 10.1 (GeForce G200). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce G200
DirectX	10.1	10.1
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 210) vs None (GeForce G200). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 210) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce G200).

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce G200
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	PureVideo HD (VP4)
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 210 draws 10W versus the GeForce G200's 30W — a 100% difference. The GeForce 210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 210) vs 350W (GeForce G200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce G200
TDP	10W-67%	30W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	168mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	75
Perf/Watt	13.8+207%	4.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 210 came in at $50, while the GeForce G200 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce 210 was 83.3% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (GeForce 210) vs 0.5 (GeForce G200) — the GeForce 210 offers 460% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 210 (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce 210	GeForce G200
MSRP	$50-83%	$299
Performance per Dollar	2.8+460%	0.5
Codename	GP108B	GP108
Release	February 20 2019	May 17 2017
Ranking	#643	#641

Search GeForce 210 on Amazon

Search GeForce G200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.