GeForce G105M vs Radeon HD 4330

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G105M vs Radeon HD 4330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G105M vs Radeon HD 4330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G105M

2016

Why buy it

✅8.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 60W instead of 95W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4330

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce G105M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌58.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce G105M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 4330 instead at 135 vs 133, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce G105M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4330 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4330 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G105M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G105M vs Radeon HD 4330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G105M

The GeForce G105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 133 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon HD 4330

The Radeon HD 4330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points. Launch price was $130.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G105M scores 133 and the Radeon HD 4330 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G105M is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 4330 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce G105M) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4330). Raw compute: 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce G105M) vs 0.736 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4330).

Feature	GeForce G105M	Radeon HD 4330
G3D Mark Score	133	135+2%
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	640	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.862 TFLOPS+153%	0.736 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	240 KB+88%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G105M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4330 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G105M	Radeon HD 4330
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G105M and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4330. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G105M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4330) — the GeForce G105M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G105M	Radeon HD 4330
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G105M draws 60W versus the Radeon HD 4330's 95W — a 45.2% difference. The GeForce G105M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G105M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4330). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce G105M	Radeon HD 4330
TDP	60W-37%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.2+57%	1.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G105M (2016 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce G105M	Radeon HD 4330
MSRP	—	$50
Codename	GP107	RV770
Release	October 25 2016	October 21 2008
Ranking	#443	#920

Search GeForce G105M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.