GeForce 9200M GS
Radeon HD 3300
GeForce 9200M GS vs Radeon HD 3300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9200M GS vs Radeon HD 3300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9200M GS vs Radeon HD 3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9200M GS
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 16W instead of 186W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Radeon HD 3300
2011Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 228.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1062.5% higher power demand at 186W vs 16W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9200M GS vs Radeon HD 3300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 9200M GS
The GeForce 9200M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.
Radeon HD 3300
The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9200M GS scores 129 and the Radeon HD 3300 reaches 127 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3300 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 129+2% | 127 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1280+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+278% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 320 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9200M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9200M GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3300 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 3300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GS and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3300) — the GeForce 9200M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9200M GS) vs Legacy (Radeon HD 3300). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD+. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs H.264/AVC,VC-1 (Radeon HD 3300).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Legacy |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD+ |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264/AVC,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9200M GS draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 3300's 186W — a 168.3% difference. The GeForce 9200M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3300). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-91% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.1+1057% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9200M GS came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 3300 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3300 was 70% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) — the Radeon HD 3300 offers 223.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GS (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $30-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3 | 4.2+223% |
| Codename | GM108 | Cayman |
| Release | March 25 2016 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #864 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9200M GS and Radeon HD 3300
