GeForce 9200M GS vs RADEON X800 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9200M GS vs RADEON X800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9200M GS vs RADEON X800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9200M GS

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 16W instead of 55W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X800 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON X800 SE

2025

Why buy it

✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌243.8% higher power demand at 55W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X800 SE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (130 vs 129), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X800 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9200M GS makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 98.5% (1.3 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 9200M GS is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X800 SE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9200M GS vs RADEON X800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9200M GS

The GeForce 9200M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

RADEON X800 SE

The RADEON X800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9200M GS scores 129 and the RADEON X800 SE reaches 130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GS is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X800 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 2,560 (RADEON X800 SE). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 SE). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 9200M GS	RADEON X800 SE
G3D Mark Score	129	130
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	256	2560+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5084 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+2821%
Boost Clock	993 MHz	2900 MHz+192%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	160+567%
L2 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9200M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X800 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9200M GS	RADEON X800 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GS and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 SE. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 8 MB (RADEON X800 SE) — the RADEON X800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9200M GS	RADEON X800 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 9_0b (RADEON X800 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 9200M GS	RADEON X800 SE
DirectX	10.0+11%	9_0b
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9200M GS draws 16W versus the RADEON X800 SE's 55W — a 109.9% difference. The GeForce 9200M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 350W (RADEON X800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce 9200M GS	RADEON X800 SE
TDP	16W-71%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	0mm	170mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	8.1+238%	2.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9200M GS came in at $100, while the RADEON X800 SE launched at $200. On MSRP, GeForce 9200M GS was 50% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 0.7 (RADEON X800 SE) — the GeForce 9200M GS offers 85.7% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X800 SE (2025 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce 9200M GS	RADEON X800 SE
MSRP	$100-50%	$200
Performance per Dollar	1.3+86%	0.7
Codename	GM108	Strix Halo
Release	March 25 2016	January 6 2025
Ranking	#864	#98

Search GeForce 9200M GS on Amazon

Search RADEON X800 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.