CPU
GPU
GeForce 9200M GS
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon X1900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9200M GS is positioned at rank 683 and the Mobility Radeon X1900 is on rank 599, so the Mobility Radeon X1900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200M GS
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9200M GS is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GeForce 9200M GS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X1900 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X1900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9200M GS.
| Insight | GeForce 9200M GS | Mobility Radeon X1900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X1900 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon X1900 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 179.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9200M GS | Mobility Radeon X1900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+179.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9200M GS and Mobility Radeon X1900
GeForce 9200M GS
The GeForce 9200M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.
Mobility Radeon X1900
The Mobility Radeon X1900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9200M GS scores 129 and the Mobility Radeon X1900 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GS is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon X1900 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1900). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1900).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Mobility Radeon X1900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 129 | 135+5% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 800+213% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+120% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Mobility Radeon X1900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1900) — the GeForce 9200M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Mobility Radeon X1900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1900). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Mobility Radeon X1900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+65% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9200M GS draws 16W versus the Mobility Radeon X1900's 50W — a 103% difference. The GeForce 9200M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1900). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Mobility Radeon X1900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-68% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.1+200% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9200M GS launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Mobility Radeon X1900 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon X1900 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 9.0 (Mobility Radeon X1900) — the Mobility Radeon X1900 offers 181.2% better value. The GeForce 9200M GS is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Mobility Radeon X1900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $49-51% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $15-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 9.0+181% |
| Codename | GM108 | Broadway |
| Release | March 25 2016 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #864 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9200M GS and Mobility Radeon X1900
