
GeForce 9200M GS

Radeon HD 7310
GeForce 9200M GS vs Radeon HD 7310 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9200M GS vs Radeon HD 7310 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9200M GS vs Radeon HD 7310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9200M GS
2016Why buy it
- β 4.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Draws 16W instead of 47W, a 31W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2016 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β400% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$20 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $20 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7310
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $80 less on MSRP ($20 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β Delivers 396.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($20 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than GeForce 9200M GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β193.8% higher power demand at 47W vs 16W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9200M GS vs Radeon HD 7310 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9200M GS
The GeForce 9200M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

Radeon HD 7310
The Radeon HD 7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 128 points. Launch price was $59.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9200M GS scores 129 and the Radeon HD 7310 reaches 128 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7310 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7310). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7310).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 129 | 128 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 0.6144 TFLOPS+21% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9200M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9200M GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7310 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7310 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GS and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7310. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7310) β the GeForce 9200M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9200M GS draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 7310's 47W β a 98.4% difference. The GeForce 9200M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-66% | 47W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 8.1+200% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9200M GS came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 7310 launched at $20. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7310 was 80% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (GeForce 9200M GS) vs 6.4 (Radeon HD 7310) β the Radeon HD 7310 offers 392.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GS (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GS | Radeon HD 7310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $20-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3 | 6.4+392% |
| Codename | GM108 | Cape Verde |
| Release | March 25 2016 | May 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #864 | #841 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














