
Radeon HD 3300

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Radeon HD 3300 vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 3300 vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon HD 3300 vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 3300
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌520% higher power demand at 186W vs 30W.
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 186W, a 156W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌63.3% HIGHER MSRP$49 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3300 vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 3300
The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 125 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 3300 scores 127 and the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 reaches 125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3300 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 800 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 127+2% | 125 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+60% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS+118% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300 and 64-bit on the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3300) vs 256 KB (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) — the Radeon HD 3300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 10_1 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10_1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Legacy (Radeon HD 3300) vs UVD (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Decoder: UVD+ vs UVD.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Legacy | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD+ | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264/AVC,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3300 draws 186W versus the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400's 30W — a 144.4% difference. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3300) vs 350W (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 30W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 4.2+500% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 3300 came in at $30, while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3300 was 38.8% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 2.6 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) — the Radeon HD 3300 offers 61.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3300 (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-39% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.2+62% | 2.6 |
| Codename | Cayman | M98 |
| Release | December 1 2011 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #598 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














