Sempron 3600+ vs Athlon 64 3100+
Sempron 3600+
Athlon 64 3100+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 3600+ is positioned at rank 1075 and the Athlon 64 3100+ is on rank 1074, so the Athlon 64 3100+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3600+
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3100+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Sempron 3600+ | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Manila (2001−2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Sempron 3600+ | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+31%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 3600+ and Athlon 64 3100+
Sempron 3600+
The Sempron 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $12.
Athlon 64 3100+
The Athlon 64 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Sempron 3600+ and Athlon 64 3100+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Sempron 3600+ versus 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3100+ — identical boost frequencies. The Sempron 3600+ uses the Manila (2001−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 64 3100+ uses Lima (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 3600+ scores 485 against the Athlon 64 3100+'s 475 — a 2.1% lead for the Sempron 3600+.
| Feature | Sempron 3600+ | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K | 512K+100% |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | Manila (2001−2006) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 485+2% | 475 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 280 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 280 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM2 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Sempron 3600+) vs 2 (Athlon 64 3100+). PCIe lanes: 0 (Sempron 3600+) vs 16 (Athlon 64 3100+) — the Athlon 64 3100+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Sempron 3600+ | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Sempron 3600+) vs AMD-V (Athlon 64 3100+). Primary use case: Sempron 3600+ targets Budget, Athlon 64 3100+ targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 3100+ rivals Celeron D 352.
| Feature | Sempron 3600+ | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Sempron 3600+ launched at $105 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 3100+ debuted at $100. At current prices ($20 vs $15), the Athlon 64 3100+ is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Sempron 3600+ delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 31.7 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 3100+ — making the Athlon 64 3100+ the 26.5% better value option.
| Feature | Sempron 3600+ | Athlon 64 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $105 | $100-5% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.3 | 31.7+30% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Sempron 3600+ and Athlon 64 3100+
