Sempron 3600+
VS
Celeron 570

Sempron 3600+ vs Celeron 570

AMD

Sempron 3600+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 2 GHz2006
VS

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 3600+ is positioned at rank 1075 and the Celeron 570 is on rank 1230, so the Sempron 3600+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
67471%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
63753%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
46290%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
13945%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
11046%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
9663%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
5535%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
5462%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
4974%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
4973%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
4918%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
4785%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
4718%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
4699%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
4656%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
100%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
93%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
88%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
86%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
85%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
85%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
84%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
77%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
77%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
76%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
75%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
74%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
72%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
71%
#1089
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
71%
#1090
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 570

#1218
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
7782%
#1219
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
7668%
#1220
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
7040%
#1221
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
7008%
#1222
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
6944%
#1224
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
6706%
#1225
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
6430%
#1226
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
6419%
#1227
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
6247%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1231
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
88%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
75%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
63%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
57%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
55%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
54%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
49%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
45%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron 3600+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 570 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightSempron 3600+Celeron 570
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Manila (2001−2006) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron 570 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 25% cheaper ($15 vs $20) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightSempron 3600+Celeron 570
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+39%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 3600+ and Celeron 570

AMD

Sempron 3600+

The Sempron 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $12.

Intel

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Sempron 3600+ is built on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Sempron 3600+ scores 485 against the Celeron 570's 505 — a 4% lead for the Celeron 570. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Sempron 3600+ vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570.

FeatureSempron 3600+Celeron 570
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
256K
Process
90 nm
65 nm-28%
Architecture
Manila (2001−2006)
PassMark
485
505+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Sempron 3600+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 570 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Sempron 3600+) vs 2 (Celeron 570). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

FeatureSempron 3600+Celeron 570
Socket
AM2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Sempron 3600+) vs No (Celeron 570). Primary use case: Sempron 3600+ targets Budget, Celeron 570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.

FeatureSempron 3600+Celeron 570
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
No
Target Use
Budget
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Sempron 3600+ launched at $105 MSRP, while the Celeron 570 debuted at $134. At current prices ($20 vs $15), the Celeron 570 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Sempron 3600+ delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 33.7 pts/$ for the Celeron 570 — making the Celeron 570 the 32.5% better value option.

FeatureSempron 3600+Celeron 570
MSRP
$105-22%
$134
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$15-25%
Performance per Dollar
24.3
33.7+39%
Release Date
2006
2008