
Sempron LE-1100 vs Core Solo T1300

Sempron LE-1100

Core Solo T1300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron LE-1100 is positioned at rank 953 and the Core Solo T1300 is on rank 1240, so the Sempron LE-1100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Sempron LE-1100
Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Sempron LE-1100 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sparta (2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Sempron LE-1100 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Sempron LE-1100 and Core Solo T1300

Sempron LE-1100
The Sempron LE-1100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 376 points. Launch price was $69.

Core Solo T1300
The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Sempron LE-1100 and Core Solo T1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Sempron LE-1100 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 — a 13.5% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1100. The Sempron LE-1100 uses the Sparta (2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Core Solo T1300 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron LE-1100 scores 376 against the Core Solo T1300's 385 — a 2.4% lead for the Core Solo T1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Sempron LE-1100 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz+14% | 1.66 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Sparta (2007) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 376 | 385+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Sempron LE-1100 uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Solo T1300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Sempron LE-1100 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















