Quadro FX 1100 vs Radeon HD 3200
Quadro FX 1100
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 127.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1100.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1100 | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-127.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+127.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $500), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 11288.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1100 | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+11288.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1100 and Radeon HD 3200
Quadro FX 1100
The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon HD 3200
The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1100 scores 36 versus the Radeon HD 3200's 82 — the Radeon HD 3200 leads by 127.8%. The Quadro FX 1100 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 3200 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1100) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3200).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 36 | 82+128% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1280+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+209% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1100 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3200 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1100) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3200) — the Radeon HD 3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 1100) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0a | 10.0+11% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1100 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 3200's 186W — a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1100) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 190mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 186W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 190mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.4+100% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon HD 3200 launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 3200 costs 98% less ($490 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (Quadro FX 1100) vs 8.2 (Radeon HD 3200) — the Radeon HD 3200 offers 8100% better value. The Radeon HD 3200 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $10-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 8.2+8100% |
| Codename | GT200B | Cayman |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #815 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1100 and Radeon HD 3200
