Quadro FX 1100 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M

#348

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

18016%

#363

Radeon Xpress 1300M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

99%

#365

FirePro 3D V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80

98%

#366

FirePro 3D V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229

98%

#367

Quadro 5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100

96%

#368

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

95%

#369

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

95%

#370

FirePro 3D V8750

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500

87%

#371

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

83%

#372

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

80%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

79%

#374

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

74%

#375

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

74%

#376

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

74%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

73%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

71%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon Xpress 1300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1100.

Insight	Quadro FX 1100	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+11.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Xpress 1300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 1100 Benchmark Check

Radeon Xpress 1300M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1100 and Radeon Xpress 1300M

Quadro FX 1100

The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon Xpress 1300M

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1100 scores 36 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 — the Radeon Xpress 1300M leads by 11.1%. The Quadro FX 1100 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1100) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M).

Feature	Quadro FX 1100	Radeon Xpress 1300M
G3D Mark Score	36	40+11%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	240	1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS+414%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1100	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1100 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300M has 512 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1300M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1100) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1100	Radeon Xpress 1300M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	Quadro FX 1100	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1100 draws 189W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 75.9% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1100) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.