GeForce 6500 vs Quadro FX 1100
GeForce 6500
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 1100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 6500 is positioned at rank #359 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6500
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1100.
| Insight | GeForce 6500 | Quadro FX 1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 6500 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $500), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 10455.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6500 | Quadro FX 1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10455.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6500 and Quadro FX 1100
GeForce 6500
The GeForce 6500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points. Launch price was $109.
Quadro FX 1100
The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6500 scores 38 versus the Quadro FX 1100's 36 — the GeForce 6500 leads by 5.6%. The GeForce 6500 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 1100 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6500) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1100). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce 6500) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100).
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Quadro FX 1100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38+6% | 36 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8125 TFLOPS+31% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Quadro FX 1100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Quadro FX 1100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6500) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 1100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Quadro FX 1100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0a |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6500 draws 65W versus the Quadro FX 1100's 189W — a 97.6% difference. The GeForce 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6500) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 190mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Quadro FX 1100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-66% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 190mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+200% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6500 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Quadro FX 1100 launched at $0 and now averages $500. The GeForce 6500 costs 99% less ($495 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.6 (GeForce 6500) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 1100) — the GeForce 6500 offers 7500% better value. The GeForce 6500 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Quadro FX 1100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-99% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6+7500% | 0.1 |
| Codename | GK107 | GT200B |
| Release | September 6 2012 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #719 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6500 and Quadro FX 1100
