GeForce 6500 vs Quadro FX 1100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6500 vs Quadro FX 1100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6500 vs Quadro FX 1100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6500

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 189W, a 124W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 190mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 1100

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌190.8% higher power demand at 189W vs 65W.
❌13.1% longer card at 190mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 6500 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.6% in PassMark G3D (38 vs 36), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 6500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 6500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 6500 vs Quadro FX 1100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6500

The GeForce 6500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points. Launch price was $109.

Quadro FX 1100

The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6500 scores 38 versus the Quadro FX 1100's 36 — the GeForce 6500 leads by 5.6%. The GeForce 6500 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 1100 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6500) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1100). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce 6500) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100).

Feature	GeForce 6500	Quadro FX 1100
G3D Mark Score	38+6%	36
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8125 TFLOPS+31%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 6500	Quadro FX 1100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6500 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1100.

Feature	GeForce 6500	Quadro FX 1100
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6500) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 1100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 6500	Quadro FX 1100
DirectX	9.0c	9_0a
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6500 draws 65W versus the Quadro FX 1100's 189W — a 97.6% difference. The GeForce 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6500) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 190mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce 6500	Quadro FX 1100
TDP	65W-66%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	190mm
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.6+200%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6500 came in at $100, while the Quadro FX 1100 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro FX 1100 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GeForce 6500) vs Infinity (Quadro FX 1100) — the Quadro FX 1100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6500 (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 6500	Quadro FX 1100
MSRP	$100	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	Infinity
Codename	GK107	GT200B
Release	September 6 2012	November 11 2008
Ranking	#719	#815

Search GeForce 6500 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 1100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.