GeForce 6500 vs Quadro FX 350M

NVIDIA

GeForce 6500

2012Core: 1058 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce 6500 vs Quadro FX 350M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6500 vs Quadro FX 350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6500 vs Quadro FX 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6500

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 189W, a 124W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (38 vs 45).
  • 2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

  • +18.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 190.8% higher power demand at 189W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 350M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 18.4% in PassMark G3D (45 vs 38), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 6500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 350M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 6500 vs Quadro FX 350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 6500

The GeForce 6500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points. Launch price was $109.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6500 scores 38 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the Quadro FX 350M leads by 18.4%. The GeForce 6500 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6500) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce 6500) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).

FeatureGeForce 6500Quadro FX 350M
G3D Mark Score
38
45+18%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8125 TFLOPS+31%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 6500Quadro FX 350M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6500 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M.

FeatureGeForce 6500Quadro FX 350M
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6500) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 6500Quadro FX 350M
DirectX
9.0c
9.0c
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6500) vs None (Quadro FX 350M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD (VP1). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6500) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M).

FeatureGeForce 6500Quadro FX 350M
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo
PureVideo HD (VP1)
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6500 draws 65W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 97.6% difference. The GeForce 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6500) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce 6500Quadro FX 350M
TDP
65W-66%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
100mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-19%
80
Perf/Watt
0.6+200%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 6500 (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 6500Quadro FX 350M
MSRP
$100
Codename
GK107
GT200B
Release
September 6 2012
November 11 2008
Ranking
#719
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.