
GeForce 6500 vs Radeon X1250

GeForce 6500
Popular choices:

Radeon X1250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 6500 is positioned at rank #359 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6500
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 6500 | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 6500 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $49), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 906.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6500 | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+906.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6500 and Radeon X1250

GeForce 6500
The GeForce 6500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon X1250
The Radeon X1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6500 scores 38 and the Radeon X1250 reaches 37 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6500 is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1250 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6500) vs 512 (Radeon X1250). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce 6500) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1250).
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38+3% | 37 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8125 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+49% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6500 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1250 has 512 MB. The Radeon X1250 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6500) vs 9.0b (Radeon X1250). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0b |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6500) vs Avivo (Radeon X1250). Decoder: PureVideo vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6500) vs MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (Radeon X1250).
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo |
| Decoder | PureVideo | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6500 draws 65W versus the Radeon X1250's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon X1250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6500) vs 350W (Radeon X1250). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 50W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 100mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6 | 0.7+17% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6500 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Radeon X1250 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce 6500 costs 89.8% less ($44 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.6 (GeForce 6500) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1250) — the GeForce 6500 offers 850% better value. The Radeon X1250 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-90% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6+850% | 0.8 |
| Codename | GK107 | Lexa |
| Release | September 6 2012 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #719 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















