
GeForce 6500

GeForce FX 5900XT
GeForce 6500 vs GeForce FX 5900XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6500 vs GeForce FX 5900XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6500 vs GeForce FX 5900XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6500
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 365W, a 300W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 218mm, a 50mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce FX 5900XT
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌461.5% higher power demand at 365W vs 65W.
- ❌29.8% longer card at 218mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6500 vs GeForce FX 5900XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6500
The GeForce 6500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points. Launch price was $109.

GeForce FX 5900XT
The GeForce FX 5900XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6500 scores 38 versus the GeForce FX 5900XT's 40 — the GeForce FX 5900XT leads by 5.3%. The GeForce 6500 is built on Kepler while the GeForce FX 5900XT uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6500) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900XT). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce 6500) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900XT).
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38 | 40+5% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Rankine |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024 ×2+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8125 TFLOPS | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2+53% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 ×2+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.03 MB | 1 MB+3233% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5900XT carries 128 MB. GeForce 6500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6500 and 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5900XT. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce 6500) vs 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900XT) — the GeForce FX 5900XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6500) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900XT). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.1+40% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6500 draws 65W versus the GeForce FX 5900XT's 365W — a 139.5% difference. The GeForce 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6500) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5900XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 218mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-82% | 365W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 218mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+500% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6500 came in at $100, while the GeForce FX 5900XT launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5900XT was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GeForce 6500) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5900XT) — the GeForce FX 5900XT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6500 (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK107 | GF110 |
| Release | September 6 2012 | March 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #719 | #555 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














