
GeForce 6500

MOBILITY RADEON 9600
GeForce 6500 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6500 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce 6500 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6500
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌104.1% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
MOBILITY RADEON 9600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 93.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6500 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6500
The GeForce 6500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points. Launch price was $109.

MOBILITY RADEON 9600
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6500 scores 38 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9600's 36 — the GeForce 6500 leads by 5.6%. The GeForce 6500 is built on Kepler while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6500) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce 6500) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9600).
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38+6% | 36 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8125 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+38% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 80 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 6500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 carries 128 MB. GeForce 6500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6500 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9600.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6500) vs 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6500 draws 65W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9600's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6500) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 50W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6 | 0.7+17% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6500 came in at $100, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9600 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GeForce 6500) vs 0.7 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9600 offers 75% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6500 (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 6500 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $49-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 0.7+75% |
| Codename | GK107 | Broadway |
| Release | September 6 2012 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #719 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














