GeForce 6200 vs Quadro FX 1100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200 vs Quadro FX 1100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200 vs Quadro FX 1100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Quadro FX 1100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 6200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 189W, a 179W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 190mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quadro FX 1100

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌1790% higher power demand at 189W vs 10W.
❌13.1% longer card at 190mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 6200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (37 vs 36), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 6200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 6200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 6200 vs Quadro FX 1100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200

The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

Quadro FX 1100

The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 6200 scores 37 and the Quadro FX 1100 reaches 36 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 1100 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1100). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100).

Feature	GeForce 6200	Quadro FX 1100
G3D Mark Score	37+3%	36
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS+28%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Quadro FX 1100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1100. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6200) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1100) — the GeForce 6200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Quadro FX 1100
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 1100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Quadro FX 1100
DirectX	9.0c	9_0a
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the Quadro FX 1100's 189W — a 179.9% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 190mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Quadro FX 1100
TDP	10W-95%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	190mm
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.7+1750%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the Quadro FX 1100 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro FX 1100 was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs Infinity (Quadro FX 1100) — the Quadro FX 1100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6200 (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 6200	Quadro FX 1100
MSRP	$129	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	Infinity
Codename	GP108B	GT200B
Release	February 20 2019	November 11 2008
Ranking	#643	#815

Search GeForce 6200 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 1100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.