GeForce 6200
Mobility Radeon X1400
GeForce 6200 vs Mobility Radeon X1400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6200 vs Mobility Radeon X1400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 6200 vs Mobility Radeon X1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6200
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Mobility Radeon X1400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 6200 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 30W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (37 vs 43).
- ❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌163.3% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Mobility Radeon X1400
2009Why buy it
- ✅+16.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 206% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 30W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6200 vs Mobility Radeon X1400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.
Mobility Radeon X1400
The Mobility Radeon X1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the Mobility Radeon X1400's 43 — the Mobility Radeon X1400 leads by 16.2%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon X1400 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1400). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1400).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37 | 43+16% |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 0.88 TFLOPS+10% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 160 KB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 6200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon X1400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1400 carries 128 MB. GeForce 6200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1400. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6200) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1400) — the GeForce 6200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 9.0c (9_3) (Mobility Radeon X1400). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200) vs None (Mobility Radeon X1400). Decoder: PureVideo vs AVIVO. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200) vs MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1400).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | AVIVO |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the Mobility Radeon X1400's 30W — a 100% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-67% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+164% | 1.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the Mobility Radeon X1400 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1400 was 62% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs 0.9 (Mobility Radeon X1400) — the Mobility Radeon X1400 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6200 (2019 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $49-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 0.9+200% |
| Codename | GP108B | M98 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #643 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6200 and Mobility Radeon X1400
