GeForce 6200 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 10W instead of 85W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (37 vs 40).
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Xpress 1300M

2019

Why buy it

✅+8.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅GeForce 6200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Xpress 1300M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌750% higher power demand at 85W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Xpress 1300M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.1% in PassMark G3D (40 vs 37), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Xpress 1300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 14nm. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 6200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 6200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Xpress 1300M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 6200 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200

The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

Radeon Xpress 1300M

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 — the Radeon Xpress 1300M leads by 8.1%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Radeon Xpress 1300M
G3D Mark Score	37	40+8%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS+301%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1250 MHz+20%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Xpress 1300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300M carries 512 MB. Radeon Xpress 1300M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 64-bit on the Radeon Xpress 1300M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Radeon Xpress 1300M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200) vs None (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Decoder: PureVideo vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M).

Feature	GeForce 6200	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 157.9% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.