GeForce 6200 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M
GeForce 6200
Popular choices:
Radeon Xpress 1300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6200 is positioned at rank 734 and the Radeon Xpress 1300M is on rank 363, so the Radeon Xpress 1300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6200.
| Insight | GeForce 6200 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.1%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Xpress 1300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6200 and Radeon Xpress 1300M
GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.
Radeon Xpress 1300M
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 — the Radeon Xpress 1300M leads by 8.1%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37 | 40+8% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 3.2 TFLOPS+301% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1250 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300M has 512 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1300M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200) vs None (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Decoder: PureVideo vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 157.9% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-88% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+640% | 0.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6200 and Radeon Xpress 1300M
