
GeForce 6200

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 300W, a 290W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 175mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (37 vs 42).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅+13.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌2900% higher power demand at 300W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leads by 13.5%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37 | 42+14% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4096+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+5901% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 2920 MHz+181% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 256+967% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 6200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 carries 512 MB. RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200) vs None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Decoder: PureVideo vs VideoShader. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | VideoShader |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 187.1% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-97% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 175mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+3600% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0. On MSRP, RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs Infinity (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108B | Navi 48 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #643 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














