GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

NVIDIA

GeForce 6200

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 10W instead of 300W, a 290W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 175mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (37 vs 42).
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025

Why buy it

  • +13.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • 2900% higher power demand at 300W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.5% in PassMark G3D (42 vs 37), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 14nm, and 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 6200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 6200

The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

AMD

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leads by 13.5%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 6200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
G3D Mark Score
37
42+14%
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 4.0
Process Node
14 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384
4096+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7972 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+5901%
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
2920 MHz+181%
ROPs
16
128+700%
TMUs
24
256+967%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
8 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 6200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 carries 512 MB. RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 6200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
8 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 6200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
DirectX
9.0c
9.0
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
2.1+5%
2.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200) vs None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Decoder: PureVideo vs VideoShader. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).

FeatureGeForce 6200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo
VideoShader
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 187.1% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70.

FeatureGeForce 6200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
TDP
10W-97%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
175mm
Height
100mm
100mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
65°C-7%
70
Perf/Watt
3.7+3600%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0. On MSRP, RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs Infinity (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce 6200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
MSRP
$129
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
Infinity
Codename
GP108B
Navi 48
Release
February 20 2019
July 23 2025
Ranking
#643
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.