
GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

GeForce 6200
Popular choices:

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 6200 is positioned at rank #734 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6200.
| Insight | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-13.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+13.5%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $30 for the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 164.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+164.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6200 and RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leads by 13.5%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37 | 42+14% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4096+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+5901% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 2920 MHz+181% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 256+967% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has 512 MB. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200) vs None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Decoder: PureVideo vs VideoShader. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | VideoShader |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 187.1% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-97% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 175mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+3600% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6200 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The GeForce 6200 costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.7 (GeForce 6200) vs 1.4 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the GeForce 6200 offers 164.3% better value. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-67% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.7+164% | 1.4 |
| Codename | GP108B | Navi 48 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #643 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















