GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Delivers 42.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅RADEON 9500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 6200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 95W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

RADEON 9500

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
38.8% HIGHER MSRP
$179 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌850% higher power demand at 95W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 6200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (37 vs 36), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 6200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 6200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 42.6% (0.3 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 6200 vs RADEON 9500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200

The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

RADEON 9500

The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 6200 scores 37 and the RADEON 9500 reaches 36 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the RADEON 9500 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9500). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 6200	RADEON 9500
G3D Mark Score	37+3%	36
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+414%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz+4%	1000 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	128+433%
L1 Cache	144 KB	512 KB+256%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 6200	RADEON 9500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 carries 128 MB. GeForce 6200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500.

Feature	GeForce 6200	RADEON 9500
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB+100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the RADEON 9500's 95W — a 161.9% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (RADEON 9500). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce 6200	RADEON 9500
TDP	10W-89%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.7+825%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the RADEON 9500 launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce 6200 was 27.9% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs 0.2 (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce 6200 offers 50% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6200 (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 6200	RADEON 9500
MSRP	$129-28%	$179
Performance per Dollar	0.3+50%	0.2
Codename	GP108B	Amethyst
Release	February 20 2019	September 29 2015
Ranking	#643	#420

Search GeForce 6200 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.