
GeForce 6200

GeForce FX 5900XT
GeForce 6200 vs GeForce FX 5900XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6200 vs GeForce FX 5900XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6200 vs GeForce FX 5900XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅GeForce FX 5900XT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 6200 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 365W, a 355W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 218mm, a 50mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (37 vs 40).
- ❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce FX 5900XT
2011Why buy it
- ✅+8.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌3550% higher power demand at 365W vs 10W.
- ❌29.8% longer card at 218mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6200 vs GeForce FX 5900XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

GeForce FX 5900XT
The GeForce FX 5900XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the GeForce FX 5900XT's 40 — the GeForce FX 5900XT leads by 8.1%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce FX 5900XT uses Rankine, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900XT). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900XT).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37 | 40+8% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Rankine |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024 ×2+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2+56% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 ×2+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 1 MB+614% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5900XT carries 128 MB. GeForce 6200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5900XT. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6200) vs 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900XT) — the GeForce FX 5900XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900XT). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.1+40% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the GeForce FX 5900XT's 365W — a 189.3% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5900XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 218mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-97% | 365W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 218mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+3600% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the GeForce FX 5900XT launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5900XT was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5900XT) — the GeForce FX 5900XT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6200 (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108B | GF110 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | March 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #643 | #555 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














