GeForce 6200 vs RADEON X300SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200 vs RADEON X300SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200 vs RADEON X300SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 100W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
115% HIGHER MSRP
$129 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

RADEON X300SE

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Delivers 120.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅GeForce 6200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so RADEON X300SE is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌900% higher power demand at 100W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X300SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (38 vs 37), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X300SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X300SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $69 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 120.8% (0.6 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 6200 vs RADEON X300SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200

The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

RADEON X300SE

The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 6200 scores 37 and the RADEON X300SE reaches 38 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the RADEON X300SE uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 1,408 (RADEON X300SE). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 6200	RADEON X300SE
G3D Mark Score	37	38+3%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	1408+267%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	4.632 TFLOPS+481%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1645 MHz+58%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	88+267%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X300SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 6200	RADEON X300SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X300SE carries 512 MB. RADEON X300SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 64-bit on the RADEON X300SE. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) vs 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) — the RADEON X300SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6200	RADEON X300SE
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the RADEON X300SE's 100W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (RADEON X300SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce 6200	RADEON X300SE
TDP	10W-90%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.7+825%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the RADEON X300SE launched at $60. On MSRP, RADEON X300SE was 53.5% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs 0.6 (RADEON X300SE) — the RADEON X300SE offers 100% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X300SE (2020 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce 6200	RADEON X300SE
MSRP	$129	$60-53%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	0.6+100%
Codename	GP108B	Navi 14
Release	February 20 2019	May 28 2020
Ranking	#643	#336

Search GeForce 6200 on Amazon

Search RADEON X300SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.