GeForce 6200 vs Mobility Radeon X1350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6200 is positioned at rank 734 and the Mobility Radeon X1350 is on rank 708, so the Mobility Radeon X1350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6200

#724

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

37438%

#726

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

33938%

#727

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

33848%

#731

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

30779%

#732

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

30569%

#734

GeForce 6200

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

100%

#736

GeForce FX 5500

MSRP: $37|Avg: $30

76%

#737

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

69%

#738

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

69%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

55%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

52%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

34%

#743

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

34%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

28%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

21%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

21%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

17%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

14%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

14%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1350

#697

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

13240%

#699

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

12002%

#700

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

11971%

#704

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

10885%

#705

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

10811%

#707

Mobility Radeon X1300

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#708

Mobility Radeon X1350

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#709

MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

98%

#710

GeForce 7900 GTX

MSRP: $499|Avg: $40

95%

#711

GeForce 6800 GS

MSRP: $249|Avg: $40

94%

#712

GeForce 6150

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

89%

#713

RADEON E4690

MSRP: $558|Avg: $558

89%

#714

MOBILITY RADEON 9600

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

89%

#715

MOBILITY RADEON X300

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

83%

#716

MOBILITY RADEON X700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

82%

#717

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

80%

#718

RADEON X800 SE

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

79%

#719

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

67%

#720

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

62%

#721

GeForce 7800 GTX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

55%

#722

RADEON 9600SE

MSRP: $65|Avg: $65

51%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 6200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce 6200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X1350 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon X1350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce 6200	Mobility Radeon X1350
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+8.1%)
Longevity	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 6200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Mobility Radeon X1350, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 38.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce 6200	Mobility Radeon X1350
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+38.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($10)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 6200 Benchmark Check

Mobility Radeon X1350 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6200 and Mobility Radeon X1350

GeForce 6200

The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

Mobility Radeon X1350

The Mobility Radeon X1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the Mobility Radeon X1350's 40 — the Mobility Radeon X1350 leads by 8.1%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon X1350 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1350). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1350).

Feature	GeForce 6200	Mobility Radeon X1350
G3D Mark Score	37	40+8%
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+40%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	144 KB+80%	80 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 6200	Mobility Radeon X1350
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1350 has 128 MB. The GeForce 6200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6200) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1350) — the GeForce 6200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Mobility Radeon X1350
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB+100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1350). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Mobility Radeon X1350
DirectX	9.0c	9.0c
OpenGL	2.1+5%	2.0
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200) vs AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X1350). Decoder: PureVideo vs AVIVO. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200) vs MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon X1350).

Feature	GeForce 6200	Mobility Radeon X1350
Encoder	No	AVIVO
Decoder	PureVideo	AVIVO
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the Mobility Radeon X1350's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1350). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce 6200	Mobility Radeon X1350
TDP	10W-80%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C-19%	80°C
Perf/Watt	3.7+363%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 6200 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Mobility Radeon X1350 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The GeForce 6200 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.7 (GeForce 6200) vs 2.7 (Mobility Radeon X1350) — the GeForce 6200 offers 37% better value. The GeForce 6200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).