
Quadro FX 1100 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700

Quadro FX 1100
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 1100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1100 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $500), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3511.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1100 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3511.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1100 and MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700

Quadro FX 1100
The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.

MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700
The MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 39 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1100 scores 36 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700's 39 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 leads by 8.3%. The Quadro FX 1100 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1100) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 36 | 39+8% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 800+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+80% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1100 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 has 128 MB. The Quadro FX 1100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 1100) vs 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0a | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1100 draws 189W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1100) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.8+300% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 costs 97% less ($485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (Quadro FX 1100) vs 2.6 (MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 offers 2500% better value. The MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1100 | MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $15-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 2.6+2500% |
| Codename | GT200B | Broadway |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #815 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















