Seria Radeon HD 7700 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Seria Radeon HD 7700
Popular choices:
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.
| Insight | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Seria Radeon HD 7700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 69% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+69%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Seria Radeon HD 7700 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Seria Radeon HD 7700
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $549.
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
Graphics Performance
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 scores 1,604 and the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Seria Radeon HD 7700) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Raw compute: 3.789 TFLOPS (Seria Radeon HD 7700) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,604+1% | 1,582 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.789 TFLOPS+517% | 0.6144 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz+16% | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+433% | 6 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 0 MB. The Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 draws 250W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 177.4% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Seria Radeon HD 7700) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 15W-94% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4 | 105.5+1548% |
Value Analysis
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 and now averages $50. The Seria Radeon HD 7700 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (Seria Radeon HD 7700) vs 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers 69.3% better value. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | $150-6% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+69% | 31.6 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | January 9 2012 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #431 | #755 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Seria Radeon HD 7700 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300
