
Seria Radeon HD 7700 vs Radeon R9 M275X

Seria Radeon HD 7700
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M275X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M275X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Seria Radeon HD 7700.
| Insight | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Seria Radeon HD 7700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $300), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 883.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+883.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Seria Radeon HD 7700 and Radeon R9 M275X

Seria Radeon HD 7700
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon R9 M275X
The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.
Graphics Performance
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 scores 1,604 and the Radeon R9 M275X reaches 1,631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M275X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Seria Radeon HD 7700) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X). Raw compute: 3.789 TFLOPS (Seria Radeon HD 7700) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,604 | 1,631+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.789 TFLOPS+220% | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+220% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Seria Radeon HD 7700) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M275X's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Seria Radeon HD 7700) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4 | 21.7+239% |
Value Analysis
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R9 M275X launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Seria Radeon HD 7700 costs 90% less ($270 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (Seria Radeon HD 7700) vs 5.4 (Radeon R9 M275X) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers 890.7% better value. The Radeon R9 M275X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Seria Radeon HD 7700 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-47% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-90% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+891% | 5.4 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Venus |
| Release | January 9 2012 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #431 | #746 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















