Steam Deck OLED APU vs Celeron G6900
Steam Deck OLED APU
Celeron G6900
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Steam Deck OLED APU is positioned at rank #827 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Steam Deck OLED APU
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Steam Deck OLED APU | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) / 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Steam Deck OLED APU | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron G6900
Steam Deck OLED APU
The Steam Deck OLED APU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 November 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,457 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron G6900
The Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 4,458 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Steam Deck OLED APU packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Celeron G6900 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Steam Deck OLED APU has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Steam Deck OLED APU versus 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Steam Deck OLED APU (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Steam Deck OLED APU uses the Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) architecture (6 nm), while the Celeron G6900 uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Steam Deck OLED APU scores 4,457 against the Celeron G6900's 4,458 — a 0% lead for the Celeron G6900. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Steam Deck OLED APU vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900.
| Feature | Steam Deck OLED APU | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+3% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-14% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 4,457 | 4,458 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,563 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,631 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Steam Deck OLED APU) / VT-x (Celeron G6900). The Celeron G6900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Steam Deck OLED APU requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900 rivals Pentium Gold G7400.
| Feature | Steam Deck OLED APU | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Steam Deck OLED APU and Celeron G6900
