CPU
GPU
T1000
Popular choices:
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T1000 is positioned at rank 73 and the Quadro P4000 (móvel) is on rank 149, so the T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T1000
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T1000 uses modern memory architecture. The T1000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P4000 (móvel).
| Insight | T1000 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $290 versus $382 for the T1000, it costs 24% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 29.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | T1000 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+29.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($382) | ✅More affordable ($290) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T1000 and Quadro P4000 (móvel)
T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.
Graphics Performance
The T1000 scores 7,649 and the Quadro P4000 (móvel) reaches 7,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T1000 is built on Turing while the Quadro P4000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (T1000) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000) vs 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1395 MHz vs 1228 MHz.
| Feature | T1000 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,649+2% | 7,500 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1792+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.5 TFLOPS | 4.398 TFLOPS+76% |
| Boost Clock | 1395 MHz+14% | 1228 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 112+100% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+33% | 672 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T1000 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T1000) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P4000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | T1000 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (T1000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | T1000 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (T1000) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | T1000 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The T1000 draws 50W versus the Quadro P4000 (móvel)'s 100W — a 66.7% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T1000) vs 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | T1000 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-50% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.0+104% | 75.0 |
Value Analysis
The T1000 launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $382, while the Quadro P4000 (móvel) launched at $819 and now averages $290. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) costs 24.1% less ($92 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.0 (T1000) vs 25.9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P4000 (móvel) offers 29.5% better value. The T1000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | T1000 | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-57% | $819 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $382 | $290-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.0 | 25.9+29% |
| Codename | TU117 | GP104 |
| Release | May 6 2021 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #333 | #326 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T1000 and Quadro P4000 (móvel)
