CPU
GPU
T1000
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T1000 is positioned at rank 73 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 is on rank 144, so the T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T1000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T1000 uses modern memory architecture. The T1000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T1000.
| Insight | T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $382 for the T1000, it costs 53% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 113.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+113.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($382) | ✅More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T1000 and Radeon Pro WX 7100
T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The T1000 scores 7,649 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (T1000) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1395 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,649 | 7,701 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2304+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.5 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+129% |
| Boost Clock | 1395 MHz+12% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 144+157% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+56% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The T1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T1000) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (T1000) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (T1000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T1000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 156mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | 241mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.0+158% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The T1000 launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $382, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799 and now averages $180. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 costs 52.9% less ($202 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.0 (T1000) vs 42.8 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 114% better value. The T1000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-56% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $382 | $180-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.0 | 42.8+114% |
| Codename | TU117 | Ellesmere |
| Release | May 6 2021 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #333 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T1000 and Radeon Pro WX 7100
