T1200 Mobile vs Arc A530M
T1200 Mobile
Popular choices:
Arc A530M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T1200 Mobile is positioned at rank 10 and the Arc A530M is on rank 243, so the T1200 Mobile offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T1200 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Arc A530M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A530M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T1200 Mobile.
| Insight | T1200 Mobile | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A530M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T1200 Mobile and Arc A530M
T1200 Mobile
The T1200 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,805 points.
Arc A530M
The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.
Graphics Performance
The T1200 Mobile scores 7,805 and the Arc A530M reaches 8,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T1200 Mobile is built on Turing while the Arc A530M uses Generation 12.7, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (T1200 Mobile) vs 1,536 (Arc A530M). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,805 | 8,013+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz+10% | 1300 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (T1200 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Arc A530M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (T1200 Mobile) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1200 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M).
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The T1200 Mobile draws 95W versus the Arc A530M's 65W — a 37.5% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T1200 Mobile) vs 500W (Arc A530M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W | 65W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 82.2 | 123.3+50% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T1200 Mobile and Arc A530M
