CPU
GPU
T600
Popular choices:
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T600 is positioned at rank 36 and the Quadro P3200 Max-Q is on rank 8, so the Quadro P3200 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T600
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T600.
| Insight | T600 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P3200 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T600 and Quadro P3200 Max-Q
T600
The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The T600 scores 6,425 and the Quadro P3200 Max-Q reaches 6,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T600 is built on Turing while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 640 (T600) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 1.709 TFLOPS (T600) vs 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1335 MHz vs 1404 MHz.
| Feature | T600 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,425 | 6,500+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1792+180% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.709 TFLOPS | 5.032 TFLOPS+194% |
| Boost Clock | 1335 MHz | 1404 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 112+180% |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB | 672 KB+5% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T600 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T600) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | T600 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (T600) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | T600 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) (T600) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (T600) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q).
| Feature | T600 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The T600 draws 40W versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T600) vs 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | T600 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-47% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 160.6+85% | 86.7 |
Value Analysis
The T600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | T600 | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $180 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GP104 |
| Release | May 6 2021 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #378 | #292 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T600 and Quadro P3200 Max-Q
