Tesla K20m vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Tesla K20m
Popular choices:
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla K20m is positioned at rank 1 and the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is on rank 24, so the Tesla K20m offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K20m
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K20m is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU.
| Insight | Tesla K20m | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla K20m remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K20m and Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Tesla K20m
The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla K20m scores 4,432 and the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K20m is built on Kepler while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,496 (Tesla K20m) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Raw compute: 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m) vs 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU).
| Feature | Tesla K20m | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,432 | 4,403 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2496 | 4096 ×2+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.524 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+249% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64 ×2+60% |
| TMUs | 208 | 256 ×2+23% |
| L1 Cache | 0.2 MB | 1 MB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 4 MB+220% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K20m | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K20m | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 4 MB+220% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K20m draws 225W versus the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU's 300W — a 28.6% difference. The Tesla K20m is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K20m) vs 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla K20m | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-25% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 19.7+34% | 14.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Tesla K20m | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55 | — |
| Codename | GK110 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 5 2013 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #470 | #474 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla K20m and Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
