Tesla K20Xm vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Tesla K20Xm
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla K20Xm is positioned at rank #100 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K20Xm
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K20Xm lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 617.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (12 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K20Xm.
| Insight | Tesla K20Xm | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-617.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+617.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $590 versus $7,699 for the Tesla K20Xm, it costs 92% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 9258.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla K20Xm | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9258.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($7,699) | ✅More affordable ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K20Xm and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Tesla K20Xm
The Tesla K20Xm is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points. Launch price was $7,699.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla K20Xm scores 4,403 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 617.2%. The Tesla K20Xm is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,688 (Tesla K20Xm) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (Tesla K20Xm) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Tesla K20Xm | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,403 | 31,578+617% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2688 | 7680+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.935 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+919% |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 224 | 240+7% |
| L1 Cache | 0.22 MB | 7.5 MB+3309% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 48 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla K20Xm lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Tesla K20Xm | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla K20Xm comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K20Xm) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K20Xm | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 48 MB+3100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K20Xm draws 235W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 19.2% difference. The Tesla K20Xm is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K20Xm) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Tesla K20Xm | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W-18% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 18.7 | 110.8+493% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K20Xm launched at $7699 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | Tesla K20Xm | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7699 | $799-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $590 |
| Codename | GK110 | AD104 |
| Release | November 12 2012 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #473 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla K20Xm and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
