
Tesla K8 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Tesla K8
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla K8 is positioned at rank #208 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K8
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K8.
| Insight | Tesla K8 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $100), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 239.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla K8 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+239.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K8 and GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Tesla K8
The Tesla K8 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 16 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 693 MHz to 811 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,111 points.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla K8 scores 5,111 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 reaches 5,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K8 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Tesla K8) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Raw compute: 2.491 TFLOPS (Tesla K8) vs 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).
| Feature | Tesla K8 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,111 | 5,200+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+243% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.491 TFLOPS+90% | 1.312 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 128+129% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 896 KB+600% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 640 KB+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K8 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Tesla K8) vs 640 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K8 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 320-bit+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 640 KB+25% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K8 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448's 210W — a 71% difference. The Tesla K8 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K8) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Tesla K8 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-52% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 76°C |
| Perf/Watt | 51.1+106% | 24.8 |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K8 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.1 (Tesla K8) vs 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 239.1% better value. The Tesla K8 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla K8 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $289-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $30-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.1 | 173.3+239% |
| Codename | GK104 | GF110 |
| Release | September 16 2014 | November 29 2011 |
| Ranking | #515 | #571 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















