Tesla M2070
VS
GeForce GT 750M

Tesla M2070 vs GeForce GT 750M

NVIDIA

Tesla M2070

2011Core: 574 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 750M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M2070 is positioned at rank 387 and the GeForce GT 750M is on rank 158, so the GeForce GT 750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070

#371
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
35174%
#386
GRID V100D-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
100%
#387
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
100%
#388
GRID M10-0Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
95%
#389
GRID V100-2Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000
90%
#390
Quadro FX 560
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
90%
#391
Quadro FX 5800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40
83%
#392
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
76%
#393
FireStream 9170
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20
76%
#394
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
74%
#395
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
71%
#396
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
64%
#397
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
57%
#398
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
57%
#399
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
57%
#400
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
55%
#401
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
55%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#148
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
326%
#150
296%
#151
295%
#155
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
268%
#156
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
266%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
100%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
100%
#172
GeForce GT 540M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2070.

InsightTesla M2070GeForce GT 750M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTesla M2070GeForce GT 750M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2.1%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M2070 and GeForce GT 750M

NVIDIA

Tesla M2070

The Tesla M2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,305 points. Launch price was $3,099.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 750M

The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.

Graphics Performance

The Tesla M2070 scores 1,305 and the GeForce GT 750M reaches 1,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M2070 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GT 750M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla M2070) vs 384 (GeForce GT 750M). Raw compute: 1.03 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M).

FeatureTesla M2070GeForce GT 750M
G3D Mark Score
1,305
1,332+2%
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
448+17%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.03 TFLOPS+39%
0.7427 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
56+75%
32
L1 Cache
896 KB+2700%
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla M2070GeForce GT 750M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla M2070 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 750M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla M2070) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 750M) — the Tesla M2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureTesla M2070GeForce GT 750M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla M2070 draws 225W versus the GeForce GT 750M's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce GT 750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M2070) vs 350W (GeForce GT 750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureTesla M2070GeForce GT 750M
TDP
225W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
5.8
26.6+359%
💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.1 (Tesla M2070) vs 26.6 (GeForce GT 750M) — the GeForce GT 750M offers 1.9% better value. The GeForce GT 750M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureTesla M2070GeForce GT 750M
MSRP
$3099
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$50
Performance per Dollar
26.1
26.6+2%
Codename
GF100
GK107
Release
July 25 2011
January 9 2013
Ranking
#698
#792