
Tesla M2070 vs GeForce GT 750M

Tesla M2070
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M2070 is positioned at rank 387 and the GeForce GT 750M is on rank 158, so the GeForce GT 750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2070.
| Insight | Tesla M2070 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M2070 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M2070 and GeForce GT 750M

Tesla M2070
The Tesla M2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,305 points. Launch price was $3,099.

GeForce GT 750M
The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M2070 scores 1,305 and the GeForce GT 750M reaches 1,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M2070 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GT 750M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla M2070) vs 384 (GeForce GT 750M). Raw compute: 1.03 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M).
| Feature | Tesla M2070 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,305 | 1,332+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448+17% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.03 TFLOPS+39% | 0.7427 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+2700% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M2070 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla M2070 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 750M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla M2070) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 750M) — the Tesla M2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M2070 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M2070 draws 225W versus the GeForce GT 750M's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce GT 750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M2070) vs 350W (GeForce GT 750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla M2070 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8 | 26.6+359% |
Value Analysis
Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.1 (Tesla M2070) vs 26.6 (GeForce GT 750M) — the GeForce GT 750M offers 1.9% better value. The GeForce GT 750M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla M2070 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3099 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.1 | 26.6+2% |
| Codename | GF100 | GK107 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | January 9 2013 |
| Ranking | #698 | #792 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















