Tesla T4 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Tesla T4
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla T4
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 17.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla T4.
| Insight | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-17.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+17.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $1,000 for the Tesla T4, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 680.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+680.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla T4 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Tesla T4
The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla T4 scores 10,153 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 17.1%. The Tesla T4 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Tesla T4) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1590 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Tesla T4) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 320 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,153 | 11,892+17% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.141 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | 1755 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+100% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 320+300% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Tesla T4) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla T4 draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 60% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla T4) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 235mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-46% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 235mm |
| Height | 69mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 76°C | 75°C-1% |
| Perf/Watt | 145.0+58% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The Tesla T4 launched at $1880 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 85% less ($850 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.2 (Tesla T4) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 677.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Tesla T4 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1880 | $249-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1000 | $150-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.2 | 79.3+677% |
| Codename | TU104 | GA106 |
| Release | September 13 2018 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #260 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla T4 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
