CPU
GPU
Turion 64 ML-34
Celeron 450
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 ML-34 is positioned at rank 938 and the Celeron 450 is on rank 1004, so the Turion 64 ML-34 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-34
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 450
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion 64 ML-34 | Celeron 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion 64 ML-34 | Celeron 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 450
Turion 64 ML-34
The Turion 64 ML-34 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron 450
The Celeron 450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $53.
Processing Power
Both the Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 450 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-34 versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 450 — a 20% clock advantage for the Celeron 450. The Turion 64 ML-34 uses the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron 450 uses Conroe-L (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 ML-34 scores 515 against the Celeron 450's 495 — a 4% lead for the Turion 64 ML-34. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Turion 64 ML-34 | Celeron 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Conroe-L (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 515+4% | 495 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 269 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion 64 ML-34 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 450 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Turion 64 ML-34 versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron 450 — the Celeron 450 supports -202% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 450 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Turion 64 ML-34) vs 2 (Celeron 450). PCIe lanes: 16 (Turion 64 ML-34) vs 0 (Celeron 450) — the Turion 64 ML-34 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Turion 64 ML-34 | Celeron 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Turion 64 ML-34) vs No (Celeron 450). Primary use case: Turion 64 ML-34 targets Mobile, Celeron 450 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 450 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Turion 64 ML-34 | Celeron 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | No |
| Target Use | Mobile | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 450
