Turion 64 ML-34 vs Celeron SU2300

Turion 64 ML-34

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2005

Celeron SU2300

10 WW2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Turion 64 ML-34

1 / 1

515

0.0%

Athlon XP 2200+

Athlon XP 2600+

Athlon 64 2600+

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

Ryzen 5 8640HS

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron SU2300

545

+5.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 ML-34 is positioned at rank 938 and the Celeron SU2300 is on rank 1223, so the Turion 64 ML-34 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-34

#926

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1709%

#927

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1684%

#928

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1546%

#929

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1539%

#930

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1525%

#932

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1472%

#933

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1412%

#934

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1409%

#935

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1372%

#938

Turion 64 ML-34

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#939

FX-7600P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

99%

#940

Athlon II M300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

99%

#944

Athlon Neo X2 L335

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

97%

#945

Core i7-3610QE

MSRP: $315|Avg: $105

97%

#948

A8-8600P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

96%

#949

FX-9800P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

96%

#951

Celeron 1020E

MSRP: $86|Avg: $20

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron SU2300

#1211

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

7209%

#1212

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

7103%

#1213

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

6521%

#1214

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

6491%

#1215

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

6432%

#1217

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

6211%

#1218

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

5956%

#1219

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

5946%

#1220

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

5786%

#1223

Celeron SU2300

MSRP: $134|Avg: $134

100%

#1224

Core i5-560UM

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

100%

#1225

Core i7-660UM

MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A

99%

#1226

C-30

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

99%

#1228

Core i7-620UM

MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A

96%

#1230

Celeron 570

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

93%

#1231

Core i7-820QM

MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A

82%

#1233

Core Duo T2700

MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A

69%

#1235

Pentium SU4100

MSRP: $289|Avg: $15

58%

#1236

Core Solo T1400

MSRP: $200|Avg: $5

53%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

51%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Turion 64 ML-34 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron SU2300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 5.7% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Turion 64 ML-34	Celeron SU2300
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($134)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Turion 64 ML-34	Celeron SU2300
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($134)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Turion 64 ML-34 Benchmark Check

Celeron SU2300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron SU2300

Turion 64 ML-34

The Turion 64 ML-34 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion 64 ML-34 is built on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Turion 64 ML-34 scores 515 against the Celeron SU2300's 545 — a 5.7% lead for the Celeron SU2300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-34 vs 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300.

Feature	Turion 64 ML-34	Celeron SU2300
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	—
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	90 nm	45 nm-50%
Architecture	Lancaster (2005−2006)	—
PassMark	515	545+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion 64 ML-34 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.