Turion 64 ML-40
VS
Athlon 64 3700+

Turion 64 ML-40 vs Athlon 64 3700+

AMD

Turion 64 ML-40

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 3700+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 ML-40 is positioned at rank 880 and the Athlon 64 3700+ is on rank 1099, so the Turion 64 ML-40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-40

#868
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1467%
#869
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1446%
#870
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1327%
#871
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1321%
#872
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1309%
#874
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1264%
#875
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1212%
#876
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1210%
#877
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1178%
#880
Turion 64 ML-40
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#882
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
99%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
98%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
98%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#895
Pentium B940
MSRP: $134|Avg: $11
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3700+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
136120%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
128620%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
93389%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
28134%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
22285%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
19495%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
11166%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
11020%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
10034%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
10033%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
9921%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
9653%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
9518%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
9480%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
9394%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
100%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
98%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
94%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
92%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
86%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
84%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
81%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
80%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
78%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
73%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
69%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
64%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
63%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
61%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
55%
#1114
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
55%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 3700+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Turion 64 ML-40 in both compute-intensive tasks (3.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightTurion 64 ML-40Athlon 64 3700+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (San Diego (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion 64 ML-40Athlon 64 3700+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon 64 3700+

AMD

Turion 64 ML-40

The Turion 64 ML-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 600 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon 64 3700+

The Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon 64 3700+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-40 versus 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3700+ — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3700+. The Turion 64 ML-40 uses the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 64 3700+ uses San Diego (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 ML-40 scores 600 against the Athlon 64 3700+'s 622 — a 3.6% lead for the Athlon 64 3700+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureTurion 64 ML-40Athlon 64 3700+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
90 nm-31%
130 nm
Architecture
Lancaster (2005−2006)
San Diego (2001−2005)
PassMark
600
622+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion 64 ML-40 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 3700+ uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion 64 ML-40Athlon 64 3700+
Socket
754
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0