Turion 64 ML-40 vs Athlon Neo X2 L325
Turion 64 ML-40
Athlon Neo X2 L325
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 ML-40 is positioned at rank 880 and the Athlon Neo X2 L325 is on rank 1185, so the Turion 64 ML-40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-40
Performance Per Dollar Athlon Neo X2 L325
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion 64 ML-40 | Athlon Neo X2 L325 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Congo (2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion 64 ML-40 | Athlon Neo X2 L325 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon Neo X2 L325
Turion 64 ML-40
The Turion 64 ML-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 600 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon Neo X2 L325
The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Turion 64 ML-40 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L325 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-40 versus 1.5 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Turion 64 ML-40. The Turion 64 ML-40 uses the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 ML-40 scores 600 against the Athlon Neo X2 L325's 615 — a 2.5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L325.
| Feature | Turion 64 ML-40 | Athlon Neo X2 L325 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+47% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Congo (2009) |
| PassMark | 600 | 615+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Turion 64 ML-40 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion 64 ML-40 | Athlon Neo X2 L325 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | ASB1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon Neo X2 L325
