Turion 64 MT-28 vs Core Solo T1400

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Turion 64 MT-28

1 / 1

445

+4.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core Solo T1400

1 / 1

428

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 MT-28 is positioned at rank 984 and the Core Solo T1400 is on rank 1236, so the Turion 64 MT-28 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 MT-28

#972

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1978%

#973

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1949%

#974

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1790%

#975

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1782%

#976

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1765%

#978

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1705%

#979

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1635%

#980

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1632%

#981

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1588%

#984

Turion 64 MT-28

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#986

Pro A8-8600B

MSRP: $150|Avg: $25

99%

#991

Pentium 8500

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

98%

#992

A6-8500P

MSRP: $100|Avg: $16

97%

#994

Core i7-4700EQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $180

97%

#995

Core i3-8145UE

MSRP: $281|Avg: $50

96%

#996

Core i7-4712MQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $60

95%

#997

Core i7-3615QE

MSRP: $400|Avg: $100

95%

#998

Celeron M U3400

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

94%

#999

3015Ce

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1400

#1224

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

13710%

#1225

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

13509%

#1226

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

12402%

#1227

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

12346%

#1228

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

12233%

#1230

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

11813%

#1231

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

11327%

#1232

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

11308%

#1233

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

11005%

#1236

Core Solo T1400

MSRP: $200|Avg: $5

100%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

97%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

95%

#1240

Core Solo T1300

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

86%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Solo T1400 leads in gaming performance. However, the Turion 64 MT-28 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.9% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Turion 64 MT-28	Core Solo T1400
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Turion 64 MT-28	Core Solo T1400
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Turion 64 MT-28 Benchmark Check

Core Solo T1400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 MT-28 and Core Solo T1400

Turion 64 MT-28

The Turion 64 MT-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $69.

Core Solo T1400

The Core Solo T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Turion 64 MT-28 and Core Solo T1400 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-28 versus 1.83 GHz on the Core Solo T1400 — a 13.4% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1400. The Turion 64 MT-28 uses the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Core Solo T1400 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 MT-28 scores 445 against the Core Solo T1400's 428 — a 3.9% lead for the Turion 64 MT-28. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Turion 64 MT-28	Core Solo T1400
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.83 GHz+14%
Base Clock	—	1.83 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	90 nm	65 nm-28%
Architecture	Lancaster (2005−2006)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	445+4%	428

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion 64 MT-28 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Solo T1400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.