Turion 64 MT-28 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Turion 64 MT-28

1 / 1

445

+4.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

1 / 2

428

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 MT-28 is positioned at rank 984 and the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is on rank 847, so the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 MT-28

#972

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1978%

#973

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1949%

#974

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1790%

#975

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1782%

#976

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1765%

#978

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1705%

#979

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1635%

#980

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1632%

#981

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1588%

#984

Turion 64 MT-28

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#986

Pro A8-8600B

MSRP: $150|Avg: $25

99%

#991

Pentium 8500

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

98%

#992

A6-8500P

MSRP: $100|Avg: $16

97%

#994

Core i7-4700EQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $180

97%

#995

Core i3-8145UE

MSRP: $281|Avg: $50

96%

#996

Core i7-4712MQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $60

95%

#997

Core i7-3615QE

MSRP: $400|Avg: $100

95%

#998

Celeron M U3400

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

94%

#999

3015Ce

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

#834

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1371%

#835

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1351%

#836

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1240%

#837

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1235%

#838

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1223%

#840

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1181%

#841

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1133%

#842

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1131%

#843

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1100%

#847

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#851

Pentium P6300

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

98%

#853

E-350

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

98%

#855

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 leads in gaming performance. However, the Turion 64 MT-28 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.9% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Turion 64 MT-28	Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Turion 64 MT-28	Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Turion 64 MT-28 Benchmark Check

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 MT-28 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

Turion 64 MT-28

The Turion 64 MT-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.80

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion 64 MT-28 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-28 versus 2.8 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80. The Turion 64 MT-28 uses the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 MT-28 scores 445 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80's 428 — a 3.9% lead for the Turion 64 MT-28. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Turion 64 MT-28	Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	90 nm-31%	130 nm
Architecture	Lancaster (2005−2006)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	445+4%	428

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion 64 MT-28 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.