Turion 64 MT-37 vs Celeron SU2300

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Turion 64 MT-37

1 / 1

555

+1.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron SU2300

545

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 MT-37 is positioned at rank 913 and the Celeron SU2300 is on rank 1223, so the Turion 64 MT-37 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 MT-37

#900

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1586%

#901

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1563%

#902

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1435%

#903

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1428%

#904

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1415%

#906

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1366%

#907

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1310%

#908

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1308%

#909

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1273%

#913

Turion 64 MT-37

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#918

Core i5-8365UE

MSRP: $297|Avg: $297

99%

#920

A6 Pro-7050B

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

98%

#922

Athlon II N370

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

98%

#927

A8-6410

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron SU2300

#1211

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

7209%

#1212

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

7103%

#1213

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

6521%

#1214

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

6491%

#1215

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

6432%

#1217

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

6211%

#1218

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

5956%

#1219

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

5946%

#1220

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

5786%

#1223

Celeron SU2300

MSRP: $134|Avg: $134

100%

#1224

Core i5-560UM

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

100%

#1225

Core i7-660UM

MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A

99%

#1226

C-30

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

99%

#1228

Core i7-620UM

MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A

96%

#1230

Celeron 570

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

93%

#1231

Core i7-820QM

MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A

82%

#1233

Core Duo T2700

MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A

69%

#1235

Pentium SU4100

MSRP: $289|Avg: $15

58%

#1236

Core Solo T1400

MSRP: $200|Avg: $5

53%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

51%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Turion 64 MT-37 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron SU2300 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.8% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Turion 64 MT-37	Celeron SU2300
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($134)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Turion 64 MT-37	Celeron SU2300
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($134)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Turion 64 MT-37 Benchmark Check

Celeron SU2300 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron SU2300

Turion 64 MT-37

The Turion 64 MT-37 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion 64 MT-37 is built on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Turion 64 MT-37 scores 555 against the Celeron SU2300's 545 — a 1.8% lead for the Turion 64 MT-37. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion 64 MT-37 vs 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300.

Feature	Turion 64 MT-37	Celeron SU2300
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	—
Boost Clock	2 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	90 nm	45 nm-50%
Architecture	Lancaster (2005−2006)	—
PassMark	555+2%	545

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion 64 MT-37 uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.