Turion 64 X2 TL-50 vs Celeron M 723
Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Celeron M 723
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is positioned at rank 561 and the Celeron M 723 is on rank 1153, so the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 723
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion 64 X2 TL-50 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($161) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Taylor (2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion 64 X2 TL-50 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($161) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Celeron M 723
Turion 64 X2 TL-50
The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 17 May 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Taylor (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $154.
Celeron M 723
The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 723 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Turion 64 X2 TL-50. The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses the Taylor (2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron M 723 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 scores 1,184 against the Celeron M 723's 1,180 — a 0.3% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-50.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-50 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz+33% | 1.2 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 90 nm | 45 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Taylor (2006) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,184 | 1,180 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 100 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 723 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-50 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-50) / None (Celeron M 723). Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-50 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | None |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Embedded |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Celeron M 723
