Turion 64 X2 TL-50 vs Pentium A1018
Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Pentium A1018
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is positioned at rank 561 and the Pentium A1018 is on rank 1105, so the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Performance Per Dollar Pentium A1018
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion 64 X2 TL-50 | Pentium A1018 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Taylor (2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion 64 X2 TL-50 | Pentium A1018 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Pentium A1018
Turion 64 X2 TL-50
The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 17 May 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Taylor (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $154.
Pentium A1018
The Pentium A1018 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,188 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Pentium A1018 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is built on the Taylor (2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 scores 1,184 against the Pentium A1018's 1,188 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium A1018.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-50 | Pentium A1018 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | — |
| Process | 90 nm | 22 nm-76% |
| Architecture | Taylor (2006) | — |
| PassMark | 1,184 | 1,188 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium A1018 uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-50 | Pentium A1018 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Pentium A1018
