Turion 64 X2 TL-52 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335
Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Athlon Neo X2 L335
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 X2 TL-52 is positioned at rank 507 and the Athlon Neo X2 L335 is on rank 944, so the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Performance Per Dollar Athlon Neo X2 L335
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion 64 X2 TL-52 | Athlon Neo X2 L335 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinidad (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Congo (2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion 64 X2 TL-52 | Athlon Neo X2 L335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Athlon Neo X2 L335
Turion 64 X2 TL-52
The Turion 64 X2 TL-52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon Neo X2 L335
The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — identical boost frequencies. The Turion 64 X2 TL-52 uses the Trinidad (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 scores 1,324 against the Athlon Neo X2 L335's 1,331 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L335.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-52 | Athlon Neo X2 L335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | Trinidad (2006−2007) | Congo (2009) |
| PassMark | 1,324 | 1,331 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Athlon Neo X2 L335
