Turion 64 X2 TL-52
VS
Celeron N2840

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 vs Celeron N2840

AMD

Turion 64 X2 TL-52

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Celeron N2840

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.58 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 X2 TL-52 is positioned at rank 507 and the Celeron N2840 is on rank 157, so the Celeron N2840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 X2 TL-52

#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
99%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#495
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
665%
#496
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
655%
#497
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
601%
#498
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
599%
#499
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
593%
#501
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
573%
#502
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
549%
#503
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
548%
#504
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
534%
#507
Turion 64 X2 TL-52
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2840

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
99%
#145
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
331%
#146
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
326%
#147
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
299%
#148
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
298%
#149
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
295%
#151
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
285%
#152
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
273%
#153
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
273%
#154
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
265%
#157
Celeron N2840
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N2840 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightTurion 64 X2 TL-52Celeron N2840
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinidad (2006−2007) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion 64 X2 TL-52 (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightTurion 64 X2 TL-52Celeron N2840
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N2840

AMD

Turion 64 X2 TL-52

The Turion 64 X2 TL-52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron N2840

The Celeron N2840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.58 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N2840 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 versus 2.58 GHz on the Celeron N2840 — a 46.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N2840. The Turion 64 X2 TL-52 uses the Trinidad (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron N2840 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 scores 1,324 against the Celeron N2840's 1,331 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron N2840.

FeatureTurion 64 X2 TL-52Celeron N2840
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.58 GHz+61%
Base Clock
2.16 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512K (per core)
Process
90 nm
22 nm-76%
Architecture
Trinidad (2006−2007)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,324
1,331
Geekbench 6 Single
230
Geekbench 6 Multi
430
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-52) / VT-x (Celeron N2840). The Celeron N2840 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2840 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2840 rivals AMD A6-6310.

FeatureTurion 64 X2 TL-52Celeron N2840
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Netbook